DuckDice vs BC.Game
Eighteen of the forty carry a provably-fair tag. Only BC.Game publishes the mechanism. What DuckDice's record holds instead, including Monero.
Checked 2026-08-27 · compared on documents both operators publish
- DuckDice licence:
- ALSI-202509013-FI1 · valid
- BC.Game licence:
- ALSI-202410011-FI1 · VALID
- DuckDice studios:
- 19
- DuckDice coins:
- 10
- Evidence score:
- 8.5 / 10
- Outside BC.Game's licence:
- Australia, France, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, USA
Provably fair is the phrase most likely to be repeated without being checked. Eighteen of the forty ranked alternatives carry the tag in our library, DuckDice among them, and for exactly one operator in the whole library do we hold the scheme itself rather than the label. That operator is BC.Game.
This page uses DuckDice to make the distinction concrete, because DuckDice is otherwise one of the better-documented records in the set: a licence that resolves, ten coins including Monero, nineteen studios, and a verification clause that names location explicitly. A tag against a scheme is a real gap, and it sits inside a record that is strong elsewhere. Where DuckDice stands among the forty is on the BC Game alternatives comparison.
What BC.Game publishes, and what a tag records
BC.Game describes its provably-fair design in specific terms. Ten million hashes are generated in advance and released in reverse order, one per round, so a round's result exists before the round starts, and the verification code is published on GitHub. A reader can take a round, take the seed material and check it, which is the only sense in which the phrase means anything.
Our provably-fair tag records something much weaker: that the operator presents games as provably fair on its own site. It says nothing about which scheme, whether seeds are user-settable, or whether verification code is published anywhere. For DuckDice we hold the tag and not the scheme, so this page says that and no more. It is not a claim that DuckDice's implementation is worse, or absent. It is a statement about what we have read.
Most schemes in this market pair a server seed with a client seed and publish a hash in advance. BC.Game's chain design is a different arrangement and is verified differently. That is precisely why a reader who cares should read the operator's own page rather than a tag on a comparison table, ours included.
The rest of DuckDice's record, which is a strong one
Its licence is Anjouan ALSI-202509013-FI1, recorded as valid and checkable on the Anjouan public register. It names ten coins: BCH, BTC, DASH, ETH, LTC, SOL, TRX, USDT, XMR and XRP. Nineteen supplier studios are named, including Evolution, Pragmatic Play, PG Soft, Hacksaw Gaming, Nolimit City, Belatra, Endorphina and Spribe.
Its tags run to six, and they include original games and instant withdrawal alongside provably fair, sportsbook, live dealer and a VIP programme. That is a wider feature record than most of the set, and closer to BC.Game's shape than the majority of the forty.
What it lacks is a figure of any kind. No verification threshold, no withdrawal ceiling and no founding year has been read from its pages, so three of the fields a reader might want to plan around are blank on this record.
| Field | BC.Game | DuckDice |
|---|---|---|
| Licence authority | Anjouan, Union of Comoros | Anjouan Gaming Board |
| Licence number | ALSI-202410011-FI1 | ALSI-202509013-FI1 |
| Register result | Valid, checked 27 August 2026 | Valid, on the Anjouan public register |
| Provably fair | Tag held, and the scheme published | Tag held, scheme not read |
| Coins named | Not read | 10, including Monero |
| Game studios named | Not read | 19 |
| Verification wording | Section 6 heading held; text not recorded | Section 2: identity, location and source of funds |
| Stated verification threshold | Not published | Not published |
| Withdrawal cap | Not published | Not published |
| Founding year | Not published | Not published |
A blank is an unread document, not a zero.
A verification clause that names three things
Section 2 of DuckDice's terms lets it request KYC and anti-money-laundering documentation at any time and at its discretion, to determine a user's identity, location and source of funds.
Naming all three is not boilerplate. Most verification clauses in this set stop at identity and funds, and a reader who assumes that is the whole list will be surprised by the third. There is no figure attached, so DuckDice is not among the five brands in the forty that publish one, and the clause is discretionary throughout.
BC.Game's section 6 covers verification and its text is not in our record, so there is nothing to set beside this. BC.Game's Anjouan licence does not extend everywhere, and our BC.Game licence page sets out the authority's own words on it.
Monero, and why one coin is worth a paragraph
Of the twenty-two brands in the forty whose coin list we have read, two include XMR, and DuckDice is one of them. A cashier that accepts it is making a deliberate operational choice, since Monero is handled differently from transparent-ledger assets by most payment infrastructure.
The rest of the list is conventional and slightly conservative: one stablecoin rather than the two or three the wider lists carry, and no BNB or Cardano. A depositor holding USD Coin would need to convert first, which puts DuckDice with the eleven read lists that do not carry it.
We record all of this and stop. Nothing about which coin an operator accepts changes what its verification clause allows it to ask for, and DuckDice's Section 2 allows a request at any time regardless of the asset used. Any page implying otherwise is drawing a line our evidence does not support.
Who each one suits
This is a close pairing on most rows, which makes the one uneven row easier to see.
| If this is what you want to check | The record that answers it | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A fairness mechanism you can verify yourself | BC.Game | Ten million pre-generated hashes and published verification code; DuckDice's scheme is unread |
| Which coins the cashier takes | DuckDice | Ten named including Monero; BC.Game's coin field is unread |
| A cashier that takes Monero | DuckDice | One of only two read coin lists in the forty that carry it |
| What a verification request may cover | DuckDice | Section 2 names identity, location and source of funds |
| Which studios supply the lobby | DuckDice | Nineteen named; BC.Game's supplier list is unread |
| A figure or a ceiling to plan around | Neither | Neither publishes a threshold or a withdrawal cap we have read |
Where the evidence favours each
For
- A licence number recorded as valid on the Anjouan public register
- Ten coins named including Monero, listed by only two brands in the ranked forty
- Six tags, a wider feature record than most of the forty
- A verification clause that names what it may cover rather than leaving it implied
Against
- It carries the provably-fair tag with no scheme we have been able to read
- No verification threshold, no withdrawal cap and no founding year published
- Nineteen studios is a short supplier list next to the largest in the set
- One stablecoin only, where the wider lists in the set carry two or three
Questions people ask
- Is DuckDice provably fair?
It carries the tag, which records that it presents its games that way on its own site. We have not read its scheme, so this page describes no mechanism for it. For BC.Game we have: ten million hashes generated in advance and released in reverse order, with verification code on GitHub.
- How many alternatives are tagged provably fair?
Eighteen of the forty ranked alternatives carry the tag. For none of them do we hold the scheme itself. The only provably-fair design described in our library is BC.Game's.
- Does DuckDice accept Monero?
XMR is on its published coin list, one of ten assets named. Only two brands in the ranked forty list it. That is a fact about the cashier and it changes nothing about what Section 2 of its terms allows the operator to ask for.
- What can DuckDice ask for when it verifies an account?
Section 2 allows it to request KYC and anti-money-laundering documentation at any time and at its discretion, to determine identity, location and source of funds. No figure is attached, so there is no level at which the clause starts or stops applying.
- Does DuckDice publish a withdrawal limit?
Not one we have read, so our cap fields are empty for it. Eight of the forty ranked alternatives publish a cap; DuckDice is not among them, and neither is BC.Game.
BC.Game alternatives ranks DuckDice against thirty-nine others on the same evidence.