Skip to content

About this site

An English-language comparison of crypto casinos set against BC.Game's own record, built from operator documents and licence registers, with the money disclosed.

By the editorial desk · Checked 2026-08-27

This site exists to answer one question properly: if someone is looking at alternatives to BC.Game, what can be established about the other options before they decide anything. Not what a lobby looks like or how a welcome offer is worded, but which permission a brand operates under and what its terms say about verifying an account. What the site will not say about a reader's own position is set out in the legal notice.

It is written and maintained by the site's editorial desk. There is no named reviewer and no invented biography, because a fabricated person would be the least trustworthy thing on a site built to check other people's claims. What stands in place of a byline is a source and a date on every fact. Those facts are assembled on BC Game alternatives, sourced and dated, and what they cannot settle is on the legal information page.

What is actually compared

The library holds 43 non-subject operator records, of which 40 form the ranked table. Each record is a set of fields read from the operator's own documents or from a public licence register: the licensing authority and number, what a register returns for that number, the verification wording and any figure attached to it, any published withdrawal ceiling, the supplier list and the coin list.

BC.Game itself is the subject rather than an entry. Its licence is Anjouan ALSI-202410011-FI1, recorded as valid when we checked the authority's validation endpoint, and its earlier Curacao licence returns as revoked. The authority also states territorial conditions on that permission, and because they are a licence matter rather than a comparison point, they are set out in one place on the BC.Game licence page instead of being repeated across the site.

The commercial disclosure, stated plainly

Some outbound links are commercial. If a reader follows one and opens an account, this site may be paid. That is how it is funded: no subscription, no paywall and no advertising in its place.

What the money does not do is worth being specific about. It does not change a licence number, and it cannot change what a register returns when that number is checked. It does not change the wording of a clause or the number of that clause. It does not add or remove a country from an operator's restricted list, and it does not put a supplier on a list that does not name one.

It also has no place in the ordering. None of the ten scoring checks reads whether a brand is a commercial partner, and partner status is labelled separately so that a reader can see the relationship rather than having to infer it from position. A brand can be a partner and rank in the middle; a brand can rank at the top and pay nothing.

What this site will not do

It will not claim to have tested an operator. No deposits are made here, no withdrawals are attempted, and no page describes a session or a payout as our own experience. It will not republish payout percentages or speed claims from other review sites, because repeating an unverifiable figure turns someone else's assertion into an apparent finding.

It will not fill an empty field with a guess: where a document has not been read, the page says so and that is the end of the sentence. It will not describe a route around a geographic block. And it is a comparison site rather than an operator, so no games are offered here and no money can be deposited through this domain.

Why the plural domain

The domain is plural because the comparison is: the site sets forty brands against one subject rather than naming a single replacement. It is published in English only, which keeps every record and every correction in one version. That focus is also why the pages are structured as head-to-heads: a reader deciding between two named brands wants the fields side by side with the gaps marked.

Questions people ask

Who writes this site?

The site's editorial desk. There is no named author, because inventing one on a site built to check other people's claims would undermine the point. Every fact carries the document it came from and the date it was read, which is the credential on offer.

How does the site make money?

Some outbound links are commercial, and this site may be paid when a reader opens an account after following one. Nothing else is sold here and there is no advertising.

Does a commercial relationship affect the ranking?

No. None of the ten scoring checks asks about it, and partner status is labelled separately from position in the table. A licence number and a register result are the same whoever is paying.

Is this site connected to BC.Game?

No. It is an independent comparison site that uses BC.Game's published record as the point of comparison. Everything reported about it comes from its own pages or the Anjouan Gaming Board's validation endpoint.